Cities with the strongest published PM2.5 and NO2 combination
Charlottetown, Canada has the lowest combined PM2.5 and NO2 percentile score of the 30 cities compared: PM2.5 2.08 µg/m³ · NO2 2.71 µg/m³ (Official ECCC/NAPS 2024 annual daily-mean station observations, reproducibly aggregated as an arithmetic mean for eligible stations within 25 km of the target city coordinate. This is a derived place observation, not an asserted municipal monitor aggregate., 2024).
Cities with both annual PM2.5 and annual NO2 are compared using a transparent average of their lower-is-better percentile ranks. The two original values and sources remain visible.
- Items compared
- 30
- Countries represented
- 9
- Last checked
- 2026-08-03
Source-backed answers
Compare each answer with its unit and checked date; the complete source ledger is below.
Showing all 30 rows
No rows match this search. Clear the search to show all rows.
| Original rank | City or place | Published value | Source and scope | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlottetown, Canada | PM2.5 2.08 µg/m³ · NO2 2.71 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 2 | Bad Krozingen, Germany | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 2 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 3 | Albufeira, Portugal | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 2.37 µg/m³ | 2026-08-03 | |
| 4 | Norrtälje, Sweden | PM2.5 3.36 µg/m³ · NO2 1.88 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 5 | Halifax, Canada | PM2.5 1.9 µg/m³ · NO2 3.61 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 6 | Östhammar, Sweden | PM2.5 3.47 µg/m³ · NO2 2.56 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 7 | Kingston, Canada | PM2.5 2.92 µg/m³ · NO2 3.72 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 8 | Bollnäs, Sweden | PM2.5 3.54 µg/m³ · NO2 2.61 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 9 | Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal | PM2.5 2.89 µg/m³ · NO2 3.84 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 10 | Lindesberg, Sweden | PM2.5 3.9 µg/m³ · NO2 0.818 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 11 | St. Thomas, Canada | PM2.5 3.35 µg/m³ · NO2 3.18 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 12 | Tierp, Sweden | PM2.5 3.62 µg/m³ · NO2 2.8 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 13 | Viana do Castelo, Portugal | PM2.5 3.82 µg/m³ · NO2 2.61 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 14 | Conception Bay South, Canada | PM2.5 2.64 µg/m³ · NO2 4.01 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 15 | Fundão, Portugal | PM2.5 4 µg/m³ · NO2 2.84 µg/m³ | 2026-08-03 | |
| 16 | Bastogne, Belgium | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 17 | Kohtla-Järve, Estonia | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-07-29 | |
| 18 | Praia da Vitória, Portugal | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 19 | Albstadt, Germany | PM2.5 4 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 20 | Askøy, Norway | PM2.5 4 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 21 | Benidorm, Spain | PM2.5 3 µg/m³ · NO2 5 µg/m³ | 2026-08-03 | |
| 22 | Lalín, Spain | PM2.5 5 µg/m³ · NO2 2 µg/m³ | 2026-07-29 | |
| 23 | Zarautz, Spain | PM2.5 5 µg/m³ · NO2 3 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 24 | Netphen, Germany | PM2.5 5.07 µg/m³ · NO2 3.79 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 25 | Ashington, United Kingdom | PM2.5 4.95 µg/m³ · NO2 4.66 µg/m³ | 2026-07-15 | |
| 26 | Bad Homburg v. d. Hoehe, Germany | PM2.5 5 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 27 | Dillenburg, Germany | PM2.5 5 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 28 | Requena, Spain | PM2.5 5 µg/m³ · NO2 4 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 | |
| 29 | Narva, Estonia | PM2.5 4 µg/m³ · NO2 6 µg/m³ | 2026-07-29 | |
| 30 | Almansa, Spain | PM2.5 6 µg/m³ · NO2 1 µg/m³ | 2026-08-01 |
What the numbers say
- Charlottetown, Canada leads at 0.58.
- Almansa, Spain sits at the other end with 7.31.
- The middle of this ranking is 2.98, across 30 places that publish the metric.
- The spread between first and last is 6.73.
Quick answer
What does Cities with the strongest published PM2.5 and NO2 combination show?
Charlottetown, Canada has the lowest combined PM2.5 and NO2 percentile score of the 30 cities compared: PM2.5 2.08 µg/m³ · NO2 2.71 µg/m³ (Official ECCC/NAPS 2024 annual daily-mean station observations, reproducibly aggregated as an arithmetic mean for eligible stations within 25 km of the target city coordinate. This is a derived place observation, not an asserted municipal monitor aggregate., 2024).
How this list is built
Keep cities with compatible annual PM2.5 and annual NO2 observations, rank each pollutant lower-is-better within the overlapping coverage, then average the two percentile ranks.
- Lower composite rank means both published pollutant values are relatively low within the overlap set.
- This does not infer missing pollutants or city-wide exposure from a regional observation.
- Rows
- 30 places
- Geographic grain
- city
- Observation period
- 2023 to 2025-12-31 + 2024-12-31
- Last checked
- 2026-08-03
- With an official source link
- 30 of 30
Cite this page
Open a format to select or copy this ImmigrationDB compilation citation. The native disclosure and text fallback work without JavaScript.
APA citation
ImmigrationDB. (2026, October 16). Cities with the strongest published PM2.5 and NO2 combination [ImmigrationDB compilation; version a6db8e72e9276ba8d90ec380f985d9a1]. ImmigrationDB. https://immigrationdb.com/reports/cities-with-cleanest-air/ Retrieved 2026-10-16. Compilation license: CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/BibTeX citation
@misc{immigrationdb_immigrationdb_cities-with-the-strongest-published-pm2-5-and-no2-combination_08bd545e93ba,
author = {ImmigrationDB},
title = {Cities with the strongest published PM2.5 and NO2 combination},
publisher = {ImmigrationDB},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-10-16},
version = {a6db8e72e9276ba8d90ec380f985d9a1},
url = {https://immigrationdb.com/reports/cities-with-cleanest-air/},
note = {Retrieved 2026-10-16. ImmigrationDB compilation. Compilation license: CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/},
}Markdown citation
[Cities with the strongest published PM2.5 and NO2 combination](https://immigrationdb.com/reports/cities-with-cleanest-air/) — ImmigrationDB; ImmigrationDB; version a6db8e72e9276ba8d90ec380f985d9a1; retrieved 2026-10-16; built 2026-10-16.This citation identifies the ImmigrationDB compilation/page. Underlying source publishers and datasets retain their own terms; inspect the Sources section and cite those records separately. View the underlying source records.
Sources
- Official ECCC/NAPS 2024 annual daily-mean station observations, reproducibly aggregated as an arithmetic mean for eligible stations within 25 km of the target city coordinate. This is a derived place observation, not an asserted municipal monitor aggregate.
- Official ECCC/NAPS 2024 station DMean observation retained at source grain; no place value is asserted because the approved 25 km observation condition is not met.
- EEA air quality statistics — DE PM2.5 annual mean 2024 (station Schwarzwald-Süd)
- EEA air quality statistics — DE NO2 annual mean 2024 (station Schwarzwald-Süd)
- European Environment Agency
- official validated air-quality station bulk; no exact target station-period input found
- Official exact-kommun station observations are derived to a kommun aggregate.
- Official SMHI 2023 national model values are derived from exact-kommun receptor/grid features.
- Official SMHI 2023 national model values are derived from exact-kommun receptor/grid features.
- Official SMHI 2023 national model values are derived from exact-kommun receptor/grid features.